Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These South Lawn results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Horn Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,437 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This South Lawn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
South Lawn
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,437
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.9%35.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.7%27.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos