Topic summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos1,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South China Sea results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,726 of 16,562 topics). This South China Sea is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
South China Sea
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos