Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Sofi Stadium results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 623 hits. Analysis detected 4,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,228 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sofi Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sofi Stadium
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,228
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos