Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Society Of St Pius X results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 2,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,024 of 16,562 topics). This Society Of St Pius X is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Society Of St Pius X
Topic details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos