Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Societal Impact Of Technology results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 95 hits . Analysis detected 549 faulty-reasoning hits from 384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,571 of 16,562 topics). This Societal Impact Of Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Societal Impact Of Technology
Topic details
Total words: 384
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles384 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 23.2% 23.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 17.2% 17.2% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst