Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Services Fraud results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 4,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,112 of 15,330 topics). This Social Services Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Social Services Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 1,317
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 47.7%47.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 37.3%37.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 23.2%23.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.1%40.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 47.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 40.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 37.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Red Herring: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos