Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Security results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 2,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,027 of 16,562 topics). This Social Media Security is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Social Media Security
Topic details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos