Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smashburgers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,873 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,700 of 16,339 topics). This Smashburgers is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Smashburgers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,873
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos