Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hailey Branson-Potts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 4,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,444 of 6,628 authors). This Hailey Branson-Potts is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Hailey Branson-Potts
Author details
Total words: 6,516
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst