Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Rings results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 744 hits. Analysis detected 3,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,361 of 16,245 topics). This Smart Rings is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Smart Rings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos