Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sleep Awareness Week results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 1,705 hits. Analysis detected 9,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,826 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (919 of 16,562 topics). This Sleep Awareness Week is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Sleep Awareness Week
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠95%Sleep Awareness Week (selected)12%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,826
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
11.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 60.3%60.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 33.0%33.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 29.0%29.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.3%27.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 18.3%18.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.2%20.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.5%11.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 60.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos