Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sleep Advice results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,528 hits. Analysis detected 6,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,211 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,320 of 16,562 topics). This Sleep Advice is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Sleep Advice
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠68%Sleep Advice (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,211
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.2%23.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos