Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Slavery In America results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 3,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,424 of 16,562 topics). This Slavery In America is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Slavery In America
Topic details
Total words: 6,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos