Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Catalanello results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 3,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,547 of 6,235 authors). This Rebecca Catalanello is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Rebecca Catalanello
Author details
Total words: 6,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst