Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos7,886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skincare results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Bandwagon, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 14,316 hits. Analysis detected 38,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,883 of 15,785 topics). This Skincare is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Skincare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 38,320
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles38.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 37.4%37.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos