Topic summary
⁠25%3 analyzed articles/videos1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skilled Trades results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 3,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,921 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,303 of 15,689 topics). This Skilled Trades is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Skilled Trades
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,921
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos