Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video2,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sistema De La Universidad Estatal De California results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 808 hits. Analysis detected 2,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (16,174 of 16,562 topics). This Sistema De La Universidad Estatal De California is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Sistema De La Universidad Estatal De California
Topic details
Total words: 8,202
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos