Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simulation Games results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 2,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,353 of 16,562 topics). This Simulation Games is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Simulation Games
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠74%Simulation Games (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.0%38.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Middle Ground: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos