Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Silo results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 538 hits. Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,328 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,131 of 16,562 topics). This Silo is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Silo
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,328
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos