Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Silica Dust Regulation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 1,604 hits. Analysis detected 7,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,648 of 16,562 topics). This Silica Dust Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Silica Dust Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 44.0%44.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.4%42.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.4%31.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 44.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos