Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisville Public Media results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 2,505 hits. Analysis detected 11,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,203 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (16 of 410 publications). This Louisville Public Media is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Louisville Public Media
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 5,203
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

96% percentile
025507510096.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 41.2%41.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 48.1%48.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 26.7%26.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 13.0%13.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Publication 48.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 41.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 26.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos