Topic summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shipbuilding results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 1,191 hits. Analysis detected 5,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,502 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,098 of 16,562 topics). This Shipbuilding is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Shipbuilding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,502
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 26.4%26.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos