Topic summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ship Design results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 217 hits . Analysis detected 1,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,350 of 21,125 topics). This Ship Design is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Ship Design
Topic details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst