Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheila Atim results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,805 hits. Analysis detected 6,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,323 of 16,562 topics). This Sheila Atim is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Sheila Atim
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠38%Sheila Atim (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 8,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.0%0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos