Topic summary
⁠71%3 analyzed articles/videos4,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shakespeare results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 2,983 hits. Analysis detected 12,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,532 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,836 of 16,562 topics). This Shakespeare is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Shakespeare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,532
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos