Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Billington results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,670 hits . Analysis detected 9,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,225 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Billington is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Michael Billington
Author details
Total words: 12,096
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.1% 22.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst