Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shadow Fleet results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,512 of 16,562 topics). This Shadow Fleet is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Shadow Fleet
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos