Topic summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sexism results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,208 hits. Analysis detected 4,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,113 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,914 of 16,562 topics). This Sexism is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Sexism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,113
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos