Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sex Parties results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 820 hits. Analysis detected 3,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Parties is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sex Parties
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Sex Parties (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 4,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos