Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Settlement Funds results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,900 of 16,562 topics). This Settlement Funds is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Settlement Funds
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos