Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,681 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,137 of 16,562 topics). This Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid) is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Servizio Informazioni Difesa (sid)
Topic details
Total words: 3,681
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos