Author summary
20% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Natale results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 801 hits . Analysis detected 7,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,070 of 6,262 authors). This Michael Natale is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Michael Natale
Author details
Total words: 11,592
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst