Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Service Outages results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 2,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,534 of 16,562 topics). This Service Outages is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Service Outages
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos