Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video1,345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Series Analysis results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,035 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,199 of 16,502 topics). This Series Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Series Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,035
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos