Topic summary
25%2 analyzed articles/videos2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sequels results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,119 hits. Analysis detected 6,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,513 of 16,562 topics). This Sequels is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Sequels
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,180
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate