Topic summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sequels results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,119 hits . Analysis detected 6,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,513 of 16,562 topics). This Sequels is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Sequels
Topic details
Total words: 7,180
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst