Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sequel Comparison results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,282 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,993 of 16,562 topics). This Sequel Comparison is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Sequel Comparison
Topic details
Total words: 3,282
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.1%33.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos