Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Senate Votes results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 255 faulty-reasoning hits from 276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Senate Votes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Senate Votes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles276 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.0%37.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos