Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Candidate results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 3,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,469 of 15,261 topics). This Senate Candidate is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Senate Candidate
Topic details
Total words: 2,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos