Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Section 230 results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,131 hits. Analysis detected 18,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,064 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,075 of 16,562 topics). This Section 230 is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Section 230
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,064
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos