Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sec Football results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 712 hits. Analysis detected 3,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,798 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,542 of 16,562 topics). This Sec Football is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Sec Football
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,798
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.3%22.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos