Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sebastian Gorka results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,608 hits. Analysis detected 8,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,410 of 15,426 topics). This Sebastian Gorka is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Sebastian Gorka
Topic details
Total words: 7,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos