Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Schools results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 679 hits. Analysis detected 6,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,721 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,787 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Schools is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Seattle Schools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,721
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.3%18.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos