Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seascape The State Of Our Oceans results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 4,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,545 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,799 of 16,562 topics). This Seascape The State Of Our Oceans is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Seascape The State Of Our Oceans
Topic details
Total words: 4,545
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos