Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leyland Cecco results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 4,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,545 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,168 of 6,137 authors). This Leyland Cecco is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Leyland Cecco
Author details
Total words: 4,545
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst