Topic summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Search Functionality results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,034 hits . Analysis detected 5,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,075 of 16,562 topics). This Search Functionality is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Search Functionality
Topic details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst