Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screening results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 509 hits. Analysis detected 4,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,131 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,297 of 16,562 topics). This Screening is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Screening
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,131
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos