Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Scott Pelley results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 6,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Scott Pelley is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Scott Pelley
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,612
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 20.2%20.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos