Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Scientific Technology results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 2,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Scientific Technology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Scientific Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos