Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientific Consensus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 243 hits . Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,924 of 15,689 topics). This Scientific Consensus is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Scientific Consensus
Topic details
Total words: 3,208
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Middle Ground: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst