Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wikipedia results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 3,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,364 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (189 of 379 publications). This Wikipedia is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 5,364
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Middle Ground: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst